<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

The Leonardo Blog

The Primacy of Process

All Posts

The Primacy of Process

The Primacy of Process l Quote-3As we start this new year I want to revisit the basic premise of my involvement in business process management and improvement — to explain it to you, to reassess it for myself, and to seek your feedback.

My working life revolves around the certainty that organizations need to be fully committed to both continuous process management and continuous process improvement.

Why is this so? In brief, it's the principle of the primacy of process. Let's unpack that and see if I can convince you of its pre-eminence — and, yes, I appreciate that, as this paper is originally published in the Business Rules Journal, that may not be easy!

Do you want a simple, but effective, practical, but well-grounded, explanation of the role of business processes in management?

After many years working on this question in organizations of many sizes and types, in different national and organizational cultures, I believe I can help you with a simple, effective, practical, and well-grounded meta-model of management.

Cross-functional Value

The idea of cross-functional value (i.e., products and services) creation, accumulation, and delivery is fundamental.  Value is produced through collaboration.

A business process is a collection of activities that transforms one or more inputs into one or more outputs.  Many resources are involved in the management and execution of a process — materials, people, systems, infrastructure, information, technology, facilities, policies, rules, regulations — and these must also be seen to be integral to the process.

Business processes are the only way any organization can deliver value to customers and other external stakeholders. By themselves, separate functional areas of an organization — think of boxes on the organization chart — cannot deliver value to external parties.

The further conclusion we must draw from this is that every organization executes its strategic intent via its business processes.

Does that start to sound primal to you?

The Direction of Effort

If so much important activity is happening across the organization, how does that relate to the way we manage organizations? There are two important perspectives, and one of them is too often neglected.

Clearly, most of the effort and activity of traditional management is 'vertical' in nature, i.e., it reflects the authorities shown in the organization chart — we manage down, and sometimes up.



This is important and necessary. The organization chart has a practical purpose. We all want to know where the authorities and delegations lie, and how decisions get made. Organizations will continue to create groups of people, of like skills or shared purpose, to get work done as well as possible.

In which direction does the work get done? Mainly across the organization.



The way in which we create, accumulate, and deliver value is essentially 'horizontal' in nature.  People and their teams collaborate to deliver products and services. Each activity, from defining a need to delivering a solution, is done by a specialist group, but all with the same intent.  Individually their work is meaningless, unless collectively they deliver a valued product or service to a customer or other stakeholder.

So, we have well-developed vertical management methods, but the important work is happening across the organization.  Does that seem like a primal disconnect?

The Primacy of Process

If the reality that business processes are the only value pathways, and the way organizational strategy is operationalized, is accepted (as it must be), where does that lead?

The inescapable conclusion is that the starting point for effective organizational management is to understand, manage, and optimize those business processes.  Without a proactive focus on business processes, organizational performance cannot be optimized, and strategy cannot be effectively executed.

If value is created, accumulated, and delivered across the organization, are those value pathways defined and documented? Are those pathways understood? Do all staff understand their roles along those pathways?

If value is created, accumulated, and delivered across the organization, what measurements of performance are made in that direction? What is the measured performance of cross-functional processes, and is there a documented target performance level? What are the performance gaps, and how should their resolution be prioritized?

If value is created, accumulated, and delivered across the organization, who is in charge of that? The organization chart is silent on such cross-functional matters.  While it is true that the CEO is responsible for everything, she already knew that, and it doesn't help. Can it be a good idea that the cross-functional path through which value is exchanged with customers is not proactively managed?

Organizations must reimagine their operations as value creation and delivery flows. The management philosophy that facilitates that is process-based management.


Have I made my case for the primacy of process? Are you convinced that the critical element of organizational management is the effective operation of business processes?

Of course, there are many other elements — IT systems, people, applications, services, rules, infrastructure, decisions, information, facilities, policies, regulations — but these all find their purpose in contributing to the management or execution of business processes.

Do you agree that the key artifact of management is the business process?

New Call-to-action

Roger Tregear
Roger Tregear
Roger is a Consulting Director with Leonardo. He delivers consulting and education assignments around the world. This work has involved many industry sectors, diverse cultures, and organization types. Roger briefs executives, coach managers, and support project teams to develop process-based management. Several thousand people have attended Roger's training courses and seminars in many countries - and Roger frequently presents at international business conferences. Roger has been writing a column on BPTrends called Practical Process for over 10 years. This led to the 2013 book of the same name. In 2011, he co-authored Establishing the Office of Business Process Management. He contributed a chapter in The International Handbook on Business Process Management (2010, 2015). With Paul Harmon in 2016, Roger co-edited Questioning BPM?, a book discussing key BPM questions. Roger's own book, Reimagining Management, was published in 2016.

Related Posts

Forget the distracting buzzwords - focus on organisational improvement instead.

  The development of organizational management theory should seek to make operational management simpler, not more complex. Is it possible that the primary goal of organizational performance improvement gets lost in the ever-increasing list of shiny objects such as transformation, digitalization, robotization, valuation, acceleration, innovation, automation, and disruption? Are the -ion ideas a distraction or a boon for good management? "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." Antoine de Saint-Exupéry [1]

What Are The Consequences of Unbalanced BPM?

As some readers will know from my previous writing, for example here, there, and everywhere, I take a broad view of BPM, seeing it as a management philosophy, preferring the term process-based management over business process management. A brief summary of that view is as follows. An organization's resources are managed 'vertically' via the organization chart. Value is created, accumulated, and delivered 'horizontally' across that chart, i.e., via cross-functional processes. Value is accumulated across, not up and down, the functional organization as the various parts collaborate to create, accumulate, and deliver value in the form of a desired product or service. It follows that an organization executes its strategic intent via its business processes. In this context, where cross-functional processes are key to the delivery of value and execution of strategy, the improvement and management of processes is critical to the optimization of an organization's performance. BPM is not a one-off project, nor an IT system; it is a management philosophy.

Leonardo announces partnership with Dell Boomi

MELBOURNE, Australia, March 18, 2018 – Leonardo, a technology firm specialising in end-to-end process improvement, has announced a partnership with Dell Boomi (Boomi), the only unified platform that radically accelerates business outcomes with intelligence that speeds the flow of data across systems, processes and people, to deliver digital innovations to a connected business.