<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Event_bg

The Leonardo Blog

All Posts

Selecting a Process Measurement Framework

Process Measurement

While many agree on the importance of process measurement, few actually implement good, relevant metrics that allow them to analyse organisational performance and conduct business process improvement initiatives that target critical process issues and opportunities. Few organisations adopt an enterprise-wide measurement framework.

Frameworks such as APQC can also be used to compare the performance of an organisation to its competitors or other industries; but, all too often, organisations use the APQC classification framework as their process architecture.

Frameworks can provide information about the average performance of organisations in the same industry and other industries and, therefore, provide a benchmark—but it is debatable how valuable this is, because not all processes are identical.

End-to-end, cross-functional processes are rarely taken into consideration in these frameworks. If they are, the metrics designed around processes are very narrow—for example, process cycle time or process costs—and do not consider the end outcome of the process. Additionally, the challenge for organisations is to select the right measures.

Organisations do not need a hundred different measures—but they need the five measures that actually matter to them in their specific situations. Using a generic measure out of its framework also involves the risk that dependencies between measures are not identified.

For example, a sales person is measured for how many sales orders he can bring in during a given sales cycle (time period). If the quality measure is too lax, we will find waste through rework in the downstream processes, which cannot be completed without all the correct and required information that should have been captured by the upstream ‘capture sales order’ process. This is called a ‘perverse incentive’, as it incentivises the sales person to produce poor quality orders and in large volumes. It also poorly reflects on the downstream process, usually performed by another organisational unit.

If we agree that every organisation delivers value to their customers through their business processes, the performance of these business processes has to be measured to assess whether organisations have achieved their goals or not. Only process-centric measurement frameworks can gather data about cross-functional performance and value delivery to the organisation’s customers.

Thanks to Philipp Joebges for his contribution to this topic.

Download 'The Measurement Wasteland' Paper

 

Marco Fargnoli
Marco Fargnoli
CONSULTING PRINCIPAL / TEAM LEADER Marco’s 25 years’ experience in small to large business operations from the ‘shop floor’ as an Avionics Technician to the ‘Executive boardroom’ as the Global Business Process Manager for GE Aviation Systems has provided in depth business knowledge and an excellent practical foundation to his academic qualification, Master in Business Process Management. Marco is passionate about helping people in all areas of life and infects others with his enthusiasm.

Related Posts

Data-driven insights can transform your business

All businesses have processes, from payroll to patient admissions. Often, the larger the organisation, the more unwieldy its processes can become.

Leonardo at 2019 Gartner Symposium ITXPO Gold Coast

Leonardo will be exhibiting at 2019 Gartner Symposium / ITXPO Gold Coast. We will be talking about how we drive end-to-end process improvement - from business architecture and modelling to process mining and automation, integration and platform- implemented for clients using an agile, scalable delivery model.

10 Common Problems in Container Adoption - And How to Fix It

The Compelling Origins of Containers A number of years ago, it become clear that the rise of container platforms was more than just a passing technology trend.  A genuine technology shift was taking place that would undoubtedly change the IT industry forever. Early indicators were everywhere.  Investment by the largest software industry giants was significant, as was their marketing positioning.  Pivotal and IBM were aggressive with Cloud Foundry and Blue Mix.  Red Hat was progressive with Openshift and receiving industry praise.  Docker Inc stormed onto the scene.  Then Google started the Kubernetes opensource project with immediate impact. Locally, there were also strong indicators.  MeetUp groups were started and quickly became well-attended - especially the Docker meetups based in Australia.  In the early days, the meetings were sold-out, and eager attendees weren't able to secure a spot.   After a humble start, the Kubernetes MeetUp was became very popular and continues to be so to this day. There was something brewing, and everyone wanted to be a part of it.