<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Event_bg

The Leonardo Blog

All Posts

14 Benefits of a Valid Process-based Business Architecture

 16_Business_Architecture-3.jpg

CIO, CXOs and middle managers that face major challenges – like: going digital; implementing a ‘customer experience’ program; planning a major new business technology platform; wanting to beef up innovation; or reducing unit costs. They know what must be done, but are looking for ways to increase the probability of success. They are fully aware that there are more failure examples than success stories.

We all have doubts about past recipes. What are we missing? How can we break away from the past? How can we avoid falling into the trap of doing the same things, over and over, and hoping for different results? How do we balance this when everyone is time starved and must generate results fast?

Those who decided to invest – to trust the approach, to bite the bullet recognising that alignment comes from hard collaborative work, and a different thinking and way of working – got significant results. The interesting, and perhaps most telling, part is that very few CEOs will go to the market place bragging about this. Would you go on the market place to tell your competitors that you found a highly competitive way to leverage acquisitions faster and better than they do? Would you publish in business journals how you were able to cut your IT investments by 30% or more while meeting your business objectives? Similarly, what organisation would talk publicly about its strategic game plan?

This is exactly what designing and managing a valid process-based business architecture is about: a real business game-plan to win or differentiate, transform, and execute.

Examples of benefits

Some of the harder benefits to recognise are:

  1. Realigned or better aligned performance investment plan with traceability
  2. Realigned or better aligned performance metrics
  3. Increased performance of your IT investment portfolio
  4. Faster decision-making
  5. Better investment project scoping
  6. Reduced IT investment waste
  7. Reduced execution risks for core or strategic programs.

The softer benefits are not so soft!

  1. Shared meaning and common language among leaders
  2. Stronger engagement and ownership
  3. Clearer sense of direction
  4. Reinforced leadership team
  5. Reframed thinking and visioning
  6. Alignment, alignment, alignment
  7. Breaking down of siloes.

We often get healthy doubts when helping management and executive teams to start their journey. This is a top-down approach – the CEO must take ownership and trust the approach. When starting conditions are appropriate, benefits come. 

New Call-to-action

Related Posts

The Process Life — What's It All About?

What's it all about? If you google "what's it all about" you get 4.5 billion results. Seems that we are keen to answer that question. Of course, it would be much more useful if there were just one answer. I have a similar experience when I ask people what they understand by "business process management" and related phrases. [2.5 billion, in case you were wondering.] It would be of significant benefit if there were just one answer here also. Good news! There is just one answer. The bad news is we all agree with that but have a different version. The great news is that we can solve this problem — if you all repent and agree with me!

Why BPM Maturity is an Untapped Organisational Superpower

  Processes deliver Every organization makes promises to customers and other stakeholders. Such promises are its reason for existence and are shaped as value propositions in the organizational strategy. Traditional management follows the organization chart with most management activity directed up and down that chart. But how do we get work done? How do we deliver on those promises? We work in collaboration across the organization, not up and down. Is there any box on that chart that can, by itself, deliver products or services externally? No there is not, that’s not the way it works. Processes deliver on our promises.

How To Replace Random Acts of Management With a Metamodel of Improvement

The simple existence of a problem is not enough reason to invest in fixing it, perhaps not now, perhaps not ever. Organizations need a systemic approach to define what good looks like, assess current performance, and make evidence-based decisions about which performance gaps to close. The Tregear Circles replace random acts of management with a metamodel for continuous process improvement. I have recently encountered several examples of the idea that higher process performance target scores are obviously better than lower ones, just because they are … well … higher; that setting a target of, say, 95% is, without doubt, better than a target of 88%, and in striving for improvement we should go 'as high as possible'.