<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Event_bg

The Leonardo Blog

All Posts

10 Steps to Improve Your Process Modeling

Have you ever wondered why process models in your organisations are not that useful? Are your process models not being used by that many people? You’re not alone. Today I am going to be talking about 10 steps you can undertake so you can get your modeling practice into shape.

There are a total of 10 things you can do in your modeling practice that will shape it all up and put you back on the path for success. We call this Process Modeling Excellence and in Leonardo Consulting, we have meticulously developed this foundation on so much of experience that we’ve had and proven methodologies we’ve established.

1. The Purpose of Modeling

Without the purpose, I wouldn’t event start any kind of effort in the modeling space.  You need to set your bedrock that will have all of the other aspects built on top of it. There are two aspects of purpose that most people usually discuss:

  1. Communication &
  2. Improvement

So if you’re doing process models for either of these things, you’re on the right track.

2. The Scope of Modeling

This defines the left and right limit of process modeling effort. This is important because you can process model until the cows come home – but you don’t want to do that. You want to define what your team does. So it’s important to get that right. There are techniques that I will discuss in my upcoming videos that help you do this.

3. The Depth of Modeling

This talks about the granularity and the amount of detail you need to put into your to make them useful and valuable.

4. Resolve the Modeler’s Dilemma

This is looked at as a balancing act of three quality issues;

  1. how well does it describe reality?,
  2. how well does the process model conform to the standards the organization has subscribed to?
  3. and how useful is this process model or how fit for purpose is it?

We talk through ways we can help you balance three aspects.

5. Design and Use of Conventions

This is an essential part of ensuring this consistency across the hundred and thousands of models you create. You don’t want everyone to have their own creative flair in producing different models as you go.

6. Reuse Process Models

Every organization has methodologies they follow. For example project management has a methodology they follow. Have you ensured that process modeling is part of that methodology? I can think of hundreds of other methodologies that are in place in organizations that you can then reply on and tap into.

7. The Role of Process Architecture

I cannot emphasize this enough. If you’re creating models out of nothing, autonomously, then you’re in trouble.  You need to put models into an architecture and what that simply means is a relationship between one model and another model such as hand-offs and value chains. Think of it as eco-system of process models.

8. Govern the lifecycle

The lifecyle of any process model goes through three key steps; creation, review and consumption. These three steps are pretty simple but you need proper discipline to implement them.

9. The Model Quality Framework

It’s no good if you just have process models floating in mid-air without any real rigour around how good the process model is. Rigour is much better if you do it quantitatively. So we present a framework that you can use from a quantitative perspective. In other words, use numbers of quantify how good a process model is. That will give you a good judge about how good the model can be.

10. Sell the Benefits of Process Modeling

There are many ways in which this can be done and by far this the most difficult categories we encounter. I will show you ways in our upcoming tutorials on how you can tackle the sale of model benefits. Notice I didn’t say ‘selling of the models’ – it’s the benefits you can offer.

So there you have it: 10 things you can do to improve your modeling practice and get on with modeling excellence.

 Watch Process Modeling Excellence Video Seminar - 45 minutes!

 

Related Posts

How To Replace Random Acts of Management With a Metamodel of Improvement

The simple existence of a problem is not enough reason to invest in fixing it, perhaps not now, perhaps not ever. Organizations need a systemic approach to define what good looks like, assess current performance, and make evidence-based decisions about which performance gaps to close. The Tregear Circles replace random acts of management with a metamodel for continuous process improvement. I have recently encountered several examples of the idea that higher process performance target scores are obviously better than lower ones, just because they are … well … higher; that setting a target of, say, 95% is, without doubt, better than a target of 88%, and in striving for improvement we should go 'as high as possible'.

Why Open Source Thrives on Cooperative Competition

Although I’ve spent the majority of my career on the consulting side of the fence I’ve also spent ten years on the client side, in senior IT roles, where I purchased a lot of software.  It was in 2006 that software sales people started offering alternatives to the traditional model of licence plus annual maintenance for proprietary software. These sales people were offering SaaS solutions and subscription-based open source software, neither of which I seriously contemplated buying.  Given that SaaS and open source software are now an everyday part of the IT landscape - why was I entirely unwilling to consider them a dozen or so years ago? The answer is simple. In neither case did they offer the benefits they do today, and, worse, the people selling them struggled to articulate what the real benefits of their offerings actually were. For the purposes of this post I’ll leave the SaaS model aside to instead focus on open source software. 

3 Ways to Measure the Usefulness of BPM

  In the fair dinkum department, the most important question about BPM must be "is it worth the effort?" It works in theory, but does it work in practice? What is the return on process? How should we measure, and report, the outcomes of process-based management?   The Wrong Answer Let's deal with the wrong answer first. It's not about the artifacts. No organization has a business problem called "we don't have enough process models." It is not a business improvement outcome to say we've trained 50 people on Six Sigma analysis, or appointed some process owners, or modelled a process architecture, or assigned process KPIs — these are all necessary, but none is sufficient. To the executive not yet fully engaged with the promise of process-based management, all this activity might sound more like a problem than a solution, more like a waste of resources than a successful outcome. And if that is all that is happening, she would be correct. We need good models, architecture, methods, and training — a metamodel of management — they are a means to an end, but not an end in themselves. Just having management tools is not the point; we must use them to deliver real organizational performance improvement. If our process management and improvement activities are not delivering measurable, objective, proven organizational performance improvements — improvements better than we might have otherwise achieved — then our process activity is, by our own definitions, waste.