<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

The Leonardo Blog

All Posts

Process Measurement - The Process Session #3

The Process Session is a weekly video series posted on The Leonardo Blog that discusses all things BPM and Enterprise Architecture.

Today, Marco talks about Process Measurement. 

Please let us know if you have any ideas for future topics for The Process Session.  

Watch Process Measurement, Governance and Change video seminar


Video Transcription - Process Measurement

Thank you for joining me again today for The Process Session. Today we are talking about the 7 Enablers of Business Process Management. Last time, we spoke about Process Architecture. Today we're going to talk about Process Measurement.

There are five phases of process measurement:

  • select,
  • stakeholders,
  • measures,
  • validate
  • document

You apply these phases to your processes within your process architecture. If we have a look at the process architecture we showed last time for a hospital - we selected the core process; we do have the management and support processes - we would select one core process to measure.

Now we're into the select phase. Where in there do we want to measure to give us the key measures at the output? We want one or two critical measures at the value chain level that is made up of all the decomposed processes that allow the measures to aggregate into a key performance indicator we wanted in the process architecture so that we can understand:

  • Where does it fit?
  • What is the impact on it?
  • How does it reflect?
  • How does it perform?

If we have a look at the next phase – it’s stakeholders. Which stakeholders are involved in the care for patients value screen?  It may not be all people within that organization and it may not be certain regulatory bodies or other stakeholders in the industry. So it's understanding who these people are, and sometimes that is the customer, and involving them in understanding what should these measures be. That stakeholder analysis is then pulled together, so we can understand how the people involved in this process are influenced (or should be influenced) to get the value that we're looking for and to deliver on the strategic objectives our process architecture and business.

Once we've got that we put a whole heap of measures in place to see what could we be measuring. Then after that we validate what was measured to see whether in fact they are correct and to ensure that at the lower levels we are not operating at perverse incentives  where certain measures are counterproductive to other measures - but that they all do flow up correctly and achieve what we are wanting to achieve at a higher level of process.  Then we need to put document controls in place where we can lock down and ensure that the process is our mistake- proof so that they can't easily go out of control. We show and develop methods around that on how we can mistake-state proof the process.  

So that's in essence how we follow our methodology in detail to deliver the correct measures for the correct process in our process architecture. So thank you for joining me today. Next time we will talk about governance -  how people are put in place in your organization to be able to respond to the process performance measures.


Marco Fargnoli
Marco Fargnoli
CONSULTING PRINCIPAL / TEAM LEADER Marco’s 25 years’ experience in small to large business operations from the ‘shop floor’ as an Avionics Technician to the ‘Executive boardroom’ as the Global Business Process Manager for GE Aviation Systems has provided in depth business knowledge and an excellent practical foundation to his academic qualification, Master in Business Process Management. Marco is passionate about helping people in all areas of life and infects others with his enthusiasm.

Related Posts

Buying-in to process-based management

One of the most difficult aspects of creating a climate of process-based management is achieving the required level of buy-in. It’s tempting to say “executive buy-in” but we need buy-in across the whole organization—having support only at the c-level is not enough to make sustained change. Getting the right people on board at the right time, and keeping them there, is often a serious challenge. Everyone is busy. Changing to a process-based management approach sounds more like a problem than a solution. In addition, we are often working in an environment where the organization is reasonably successful, so what problem are we trying to fix?

The Primacy of Process

As we start this new year I want to revisit the basic premise of my involvement in business process management and improvement — to explain it to you, to reassess it for myself, and to seek your feedback. My working life revolves around the certainty that organizations need to be fully committed to both continuous process management and continuous process improvement. Why is this so? In brief, it's the principle of the primacy of process. Let's unpack that and see if I can convince you of its pre-eminence — and, yes, I appreciate that, as this paper is originally published in the Business Rules Journal, that may not be easy! Do you want a simple, but effective, practical, but well-grounded, explanation of the role of business processes in management? After many years working on this question in organizations of many sizes and types, in different national and organizational cultures, I believe I can help you with a simple, effective, practical, and well-grounded meta-model of management.

Are We Too Good at Fixing Process Problems?

Arriving at your destination airport to discover that your checked-in bags are somewhere else is a sufficiently common occurrence to have travelers staring anxiously at the stationary carousel, then fixedly watching the point where bags are first seen, and then breathing a sigh of relief on seeing their bags finally appear. SITA reports1 that 4 billion passengers checked in 4.5 billion bags last year. While only about six bags per thousand passengers get lost, lost bags (more gently termed by the airline industry ‘mishandled baggage’) is a significant problem for airlines, airport owners and managers, and their customers. SITA further reports2 that in 2016 alone, baggage mishandling cost the industry US$2.1 billion, and in the period 2007-2016, the industry cost was a staggering US$27 Billion. The problem is easing3 with the use of new technology, but millions of pieces of luggage are still being ‘lost’ each year, costing the airlines significant amounts, and causing considerable aggravation for travelers.4