<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Event_bg

The Leonardo Blog

All Posts

Resolving the Modeler's Dilemma

Hey everyone and welcome once again to the process sessions. In this video I'll be talking about resolving the process modeler's dilemma. What is the dilemma? You might ask. It's a delicate balance of conformance, accuracy, and fit for purpose for every single process model you have.

Imagine this you have to create a process model for your senior management group and you decide to put in a process model that they can understand easily. Chances that that process model is fit for the purpose of your presentation, but it may be thin on details such as granularity. It might also not conform to those standards that the organization conforms to. Now it may be the case that that's happened, and if it has ever happened to you, or if you can imagine it you're not alone. That's why you need to resolve the modeler's dilemma.

Semantic, Syntactic, and Pragmatic

 I call those three quality semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic. Semantic refers to how accurate your process model is. Syntactic refers to the conformance of your process model to your organizational standards. And finally, pragmatic, how fit for purpose it is. When a model lives up to all of those three aspects you've got a great valuable model.

ModEx_-_Resolve_Modelers_Dilemma.00_00_08_10.Still001.jpgYou want to resolve the modeler's dilemma because you want to create high quality process models that have high integrity. You want to create process models that are consistent across the entire organization. You want to create models that will be used, and for those reasons alone you need to be able to resolve the modeler's dilemma. There are many ways to the resolution of the process modeler's dilemma. One of the key ways in which I do it is to make sure that I've got the right stakeholders guiding me through all three aspects of quality.

For the semantic review, I look upon the subject matter experts to give me guidance on how accurate a process model technically is.

For syntactic standards, I look upon a power user across the organization who can give me clear guidance on how good a process model informs to the standards.

Finally pragmatic quality, I look upon the users and consumers of the process models to then get an understanding of whether this model fits that purpose or not.

When you gather input from all three areas you have a good idea of who the kind of balance that you need to employ in all your process models to make them valuable and successful.

To summarize, the process modelers dilemma is real. Your models could be skewed towards pragmatic or towards semantic or towards syntactic or potentially a combination of. Find a way to balance the right aspects and you can do so by approaching the right stakeholders and getting them involved in your modeling journey. I wish you the best for your modeling efforts and I'll see you at the next one.

Watch Process Modeling Excellence Video Seminar - 45 minutes!

Related Posts

UST Acquires Leading Australian Process Transformation Company Leonardo

UST Acquires Leading Australian Process Transformation Company Leonardo - Strategic acquisition further strengthens UST’s position in the dynamic ANZ market Melbourne, Australia, 21 February 2024:UST, a leading digital transformation solutions company, has announced the strategic acquisition of Leonardo, a leading provider of business process improvement, automation, and integration services in the ANZ region. The acquisition by UST will empower Leonardo to expand its market reach and enhance its service offerings for clients, combining Leonardo's in-depth process expertise with UST's technology leadership, digital transformation capabilities, and global credentials, and strengthening UST's position in the Australian market.

How to Present Business Process Models to Stakeholders

Has an audience member ever interrupted in the middle of a presentation about process analysis to ask, “Can you show us the process models in a simple PowerPoint slide?” – or, ”I don’t want to look at the green and purple boxes, just show me the flow!” Perhaps you then felt that you had wasted some of your efforts in modelling the process with too much detail or in the wrong way. Embarrassed and demoralised, you must have wondered how else could these models be presented. Well, you are not alone! This is a common dilemma when there is a need to present process models to a variety of audiences. There is both art and science in presenting the right level of process detail to the right group of stakeholders, especially if they are not familiar with the process modelling language. Effective presentation is even more critical in larger and complex end-to-end process improvement work and in new automated business model implementations. You may need to use multiple model types to describe the same business processes to various audiences. Hence, it is very important to understand who the stakeholders are and what they would like to see before your audience with them. This article proposes an approach to the effective presentation of business process models based on three key elements: understand, organise, and communicate.

What Are The Most Important Questions In Business Process Management?

She who dies with the most answers wins. We seek the truth. We want to know the answers. Paul Harmon started me thinking recently when he invited members of the BPTrends Discussion group on LinkedIn to “describe the purpose of Business Process Management in 160 characters, including spaces and punctuation.” Not easy to do – have a go at it yourself. It felt like I was crafting The Ultimate BPM Answer, which, of course, begged The Ultimate BPM Question. That got me thinking that The Ultimate BPM Problem is that we have plenty of answers and not enough questions. So put all the answers aside for a moment and help me to work out what are the most important questions in Business Process Management?