<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1907245749562386&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Adam Mutton

Working in the IT industry locally and overseas for over 25 years on IT projects has provided Adam with the experience and skills to deliver complex solutions. He is now focusing those skills and experience in managing a successful Delivery business specialising in BPM, Integration and Project Delivery Services. Adam's focus is always on getting the right result and ensuring there is a clear understanding around expectations, outcomes and fostering a team environment.
Find me on:

Recent Posts

Driving a Repeatable Robust Model of Integration

Adam Mutton Adam Mutton on February 27, 2018

 

Integration efforts are frequently suppressed by the high cost of latent resources, slow delivery models, expensive licensing alongside the battle of retaining the capability of staff year on year. The maturity of open source combined with advancements in cloud technologies presents great opportunities to realise the potential of a scalable, subscription based integration to meet business challenges & drive business transformation.

Below is a transcription from the presentation by Adam Mutton at the Red Hat Forum in Sydney, October 2017. 

--

 

The maturity of open source, combined with advancements in cloud technologies has presented a great opportunity to realise the potential of a scalable subscription-based integration model that meets business challenges and drives business transformation. I'm here today to talk to you about the direction Leonardo was seeing integration heading in, and how we see it driving towards a replicable, repeatable, and robust model of integration, and what kinds of tools and services that are required to make that a reality. 
Leonardo have been in the IT industry for almost 20 years and until recently, has been well known for high-end BPM consulting. However, in the last few years, Leonardo identified a need to connect business process improvement with actual execution.

To achieve this, we assembled what we believe is some of the best integration people in the industry and extended our capability to include the delivery of automation and integration solutions, or what we're calling the Leonardo stack. This is the connection between BPM automation and integration - the connected view of the organisation that allows us to take a slice of your business processes and improve them gradually over time.

So, what's the thing we're hearing from our clients about that they want to achieve - but they can't quite put their finger on what it is they want to do?

What we at Leonardo is seeing is a paradigm shift in the market towards a sustainable full business integration.

What it isn't

Before I go on and explain what we think that means, let me tell you what it's not.

RedHat_Forum2017-34.png

1. It's not expensive perpetual software licenses

It's not expensive perpetual licences - or as we call it sticker shock.

I'm sure you've all worked on projects that have spent millions of dollars on hardware and software. You've expended effort in getting the teams together, getting everything ready to go, all before you've ever cut one line of code.

RedHat_Forum2017-33.png
2. It's not multiple vendors and integrators

It's typically involving multiple vendors supplying various parts of the solution, software, hardware, services, support, all usually working independently of each another and not very cohesively. If you've done large transformation projects before, you'll know what I'm talking about.

RedHat_Forum2017-32.png

3. It's not slow delivery models

All delivery models have their place. However if we're thinking of innovative ways about how you improve your business, we need to think about new ways of delivering those projects.
RedHat_Forum2017-31.png
4. It's not monolithic ESB implementations

The modern two-speed deployment model, it still needs a ESB to play I'ts role. However, when we talk about agility, time to market, code management to deployment, the monolithic ESB is not the way to achieve this.
RedHat_Forum2017-30.png
5. It's not maintaining high-cost specialist in-house resources

What it's not is not maintaining a capability in-house in order to keep the lights on.
Reactive behaviour to business requests is costly and inefficient. The days of the in-house chin rubbing ( as I call them) ICC people are dead. Business are done dealing with the key man syndrome (retaining people around just because of their special skills). The staff themselves, they want to be more innovative and more engaged.


So, what do our clients telling us?

RedHat_Forum2017-29.png
1. Don't want to be stuck in waterfall centric multi-year transformation projects

Well, what they're telling us is that they don't want to be stuck in huge big bang projects anymore. They are too costly and usually don't deliver on their promises. If you ever been at restaurant, you would send back the dish saying "This is not the steak I ordered…." .
RedHat_Forum2017-28.png
2. Don't want wasteful dead-time development

What they're telling us is that they don't want to have teams of people sitting around, waiting for requirements, or even waiting for hardware / software to become available. This is dead time in the delivery world. I'm a crusty old project manager and I know how dead time can be a project management killer. Clients don't want to warehouse their people anymore for the specific skills. What they want, and what they should be able to get is that these skills should be on demand when they want them.
RedHat_Forum2017-27.png
3. Don't want costly upgrade cycles

What that telling us is that they're overpaying massive upgrade fees, licences and services just to maintain technical currency. This locks them into a non-negotiable position with their vendor and specialised staff. This is not the way to be an agile organisation.
RedHat_Forum2017-26.png
4. Don't want to create situation of vendor conflict AND change ransom request

On top of all of this, what we're finding is that clients find themselves inmanagement ransom. They want to get away from having to worry about technology, and they want to get on with what they do best.

We all know what Coca-Cola is, right

Let Coke market and sell Coke. That's what they're good at. IThey shouldn't have to worry about the technology. The technology should just be the thing that helps makes their core business happen. Business and technology should be seamless.


What our clients are asking us to help them with

We talked to our clients - they told us their thinking, their pain and what they want to achieve, and this opened a dialogue about how we can help them
RedHat_Forum2017-25.png
1. Help them get off fluctuating cycle of ramp up and ramp down.
They said they want to get off that wave - the up and down wave - of work versus resources, new work versus upgrades.

It's the old problem. You've got too many people on the bench and not enough work, or too much work and not enough people, or you want to get new work done but you need an upgrade because the feature is not available, or you have all these things in place but you're out of currency. These are all problems that just kill you. It's unsustainable, it's not reliable, and it's costly.
RedHat_Forum2017-24.png
2. Help them change culture from reaction to innovation
They told us that they want to be innovative and they want to get ahead of the curve. They don't just want to be reactive to the business. They want to be able to commit to quick turnaround times.

They want to be able to achieve business agility. The want to raise the level of the staff satisfaction. Stop people walking out the door because they aren't challenged working here and want to do more innovative things. Clients want to make it exciting for staff to come to work.
RedHat_Forum2017-23.png
3. Help them become focused on business not IT
The business wants to do what they do well and not be hampered by IT - remember what I said about Coke? It should be holistic - not IT for IT sake….
RedHat_Forum2017-22.png
4. Help them do full business integration
What we're talking about is connecting across the whole business. We believe it's time that integration was redefined. Integration is connection.

The connection of things is about bringing all areas of business and IT together in order to achieve a positive outcome for the business. It should be everyone working together.
RedHat_Forum2017-21.png
5. Help deliver pay as you go business models
Clients are telling us they want to pay as they go and see immediate value. They want to get away from the huge licence fees, big service fees, and big transformation projects. By paying as you go and what we've seen so far - is that you can show you value to the business and get better stakeholder buy in. Then clients can do the next step, and then the next step. What this does is enables the continual improvement cycle.
RedHat_Forum2017-20.png
6. Help deliver a manage capability and services model
What clients are telling us is that they want to manage service. This managed service would provide a high-end capability with dynamic availability. They want a model that enables business agility through CI-CD, DevOps and Agile. They also want to reduce total cost of ownership.


What does sustainable integration look like?

It's some form of a flexible managed service that has the following features:

RedHat_Forum2017-19.png

  • It's subscription-based.
RedHat_Forum2017-18.png
  • It encompasses technology plus delivery.
    • The two must go hand in hand.
RedHat_Forum2017-17.png
  • It has microservices, CI-CD, APIs, DevOps, Agile.
    • The technology all developers love diving into.
RedHat_Forum2017-16.png
RedHat_Forum2017-15.png
  • It's cloud-based
RedHat_Forum2017-14.png
  • It allows you to develop and deploy microservices.
    • More and more we see benefits and necessity of microservices and the ability to turn projects around quickly and provide value back to the client.
RedHat_Forum2017-13.png
  • All underpinned by a source code management process that ensures code quality and speed to deployment.
    • Think Google, Facebook, and now, AWS and IAG. Until the keynote today until today, I wasn't aware at how quickly companies like this were turning these things around. I would never thought of seconds or minutes in terms of deployment. I would have thought every hour or so.
    • Developers today want to deploy and test rapidly. If it doesn't work, they'll take it down. But they don't have to redeploy huge volumes anymore and deal with massive downtime.
    • Perhaps you should think about how source code management could benefit your organisation today. The speed at which business can react to market movements makes me evaluate everything - perhaps you should be to.
RedHat_Forum2017-12.png

  • It's specialist capability on demand.
    • In other words, clients and our clients don't have to carry a bench anymore. They don't have to worry about warehousing staff for the skills. It's on demand as required. Think of it as a virtual bench that you can draw on. This in itself cuts a huge waste out of any development and deployment that you're doing. Huge benefits to be gained.


Leonardo's connected stack

RedHat_Forum2017-LCstack.png

This helps us achieve & deliver all the elements above by connecting the process lifecycle, building confidence with our stakeholders, aligning business and IT, lowering total cost of ownership, driving continuous process improvement, and enabling business agility and digital readiness.


Why Red Hat?

RedHat_Forum2017-2a.png

Portfolio of enterprise grade support technologies

The question gets asked, why Red Hat?

Red Hat have portfolio products that make this all possible for us.

In Red Hat OpenShift, you've got your concept, containerization, self-healing, scalability - no more heavyweight VMs to contend with. Red Hat JBoss Fuse delivers enterprise lightweight ESB solutions. Red Hat 3Scale gives you API management. Red Hat JBoss BPMS gives you automation and workflow engine. This is complimented by other tools such as Red Hat Ansible, Red Hat Data Virtualization, Red Hat BRMS.

You have the ability to integrate with other best Red Hat technologies as well which is a key factor here. There are other open source projects going on all the time and you always got the ability either to integrate with them or you can go to a vendor specific product in the marketplace as well. So, it gives you flexibility and ability to innovate.
RedHat_Forum2017-5.png
Open Source Minded

Red Hat, they're open source-minded. They are one of the key pioneers of open source. Open source gives us diversity and flexibility. It gives us vendor choice. You're not just locked into one vendor. Importantly, it gives you the innovation that comes from the open source community which gives a great benefit to everyone.
RedHat_Forum2017-4.png
Subscription Based

At it's core, Red Hat is subscription-based. More and more situations with our clients, they rather go to subscription-based model than the big licence fee.
RedHat_Forum2017-3.png
Enables Continuous Improvement

The Red Hat product suite is what enables us to actually deliver continuous improvement and the new fully connected integrated business.

Where is all this heading?

As I mentioned previously at Leonardo, we have seen a bit of a paradigm shift in the market towards a full stack managed service of business and IT that enables business agility and process improvement. We have the knowledge. We have the know-how and we have the technology to make that happens seamlessly for the client. We achieve this via the Leonardo connected stack and managed services - all powered by Red Hat. We're actually delivering benefits to businesses today.

RedHat_Forum2017-1.png

To return to the original question - 'Is a replicable, repeatable, and robust model of integration delivery possible?

The answer, we believe, is yes.

It is possible for a full business integration via the Leonardo stack.

This gives you a robust model of integration delivery.

 

Sign Up for Our BPM Automation Integration Workshop

Topics: Intergration, redhat

5 Questions to Ask About Your Middleware/ ESB Strategy

Adam Mutton Adam Mutton on November 13, 2017

Reduce_ESB_TCO.png

Do you use an on-premises Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) architecture to integrate applications and services? If so, you’ve probably noticed that cracks are showing up in your IT infrastructure. This will accelerate as more applications migrate to the cloud. Chances are, you’ve invested heavily in these solutions and are reluctant to replace them.

There is a way to extend your investment and achieve a more modern architecturethat can handle the complexity of today’s more demanding data, platforms and business systems. First, it makes sense to review the reasons you may want to begin modernising your on-premises legacy middleware solutions today.

A primary reason is reducing the total cost of ownership (TCO) of your current ESB/ Integration solution.

Answering these 5 questions will give a better understanding of the overall cost you might be incurring now with your aging middleware solutions, as well as future upgrades you might be undertaking or planning to pursue. 

1. Are you factoring in operational expenditure? (OPEX)?

When calculating the costs of integration platforms, companies typically consider only the capital expenditure angle, but OPEX can be significant. In addition to the hardware and software costs outlined in your budget, take a look at the expenses associated with DIY development.

2. What are your compliance and security costs?

If your data includes personal health or financial information like credit card numbers, you’ll have to invest in certifications to demonstrate that you’re compliant with data privacy and security regulations like PCI and HIPAA.

3. What is the real cost of developer productivity?

Another important consideration is the rising cost of employing and retaining iPaaS developers, which offsets productivity gains.

4. What does it cost to accommodate new data sources and formats?

To calculate the overall costs of ESB ownership, you must factor in the expense of dealing with new data streams and formats. 

5. What does ESB cost in terms of lost opportunities to innovate?

The IT professionals who are engaged in integration don’t have time to focus on more strategic tasks and gaining insights to advance your business and meet your customer needs. This type of expense is almost never factored into the total cost of ESB ownership. It should be.

Sign Up for Our BPM Automation Integration Workshop

Topics: Intergration

Is Efficient, Cost-Effective Integration Possible?

Adam Mutton Adam Mutton on August 14, 2016

16_delivery_intergratio.jpg

An analysis on the next major paradigm shift.

The goal of most business is to grow revenue, whilst reducing costs and increasing profits - sounds simple enough.  

The problem is, we often have to invest a substantial amount of capital in the business only to get a return on that investment over a number of years.  It is this investment that is usually an inhibiter to a business adopting a best of breed approach resulting in sub-par solutions full of technical debt which is then difficult to maintain.  The business gets bound to key staff, infrastructure that becomes obsolete, software that requires constant upgrades and excessive ongoing ’business-as-usual’ costs.  

As modern businesses attempt to become more efficient through the use of technology, they sometimes hedge due to the risk/ROI ratio that includes a large ticket price and a moderate time to market.  

They essentially see the benefits like opening up their ‘digital channel’, or making their core systems more cohesive and the business more efficient.  However, they can’t justify the unguaranteed ROI over a multi-year return period. 

It’s a problem faced by Tier-n companies as they are constantly under pressure to reduce IT costs and until now their options have been limited to some form of outsourcing.  Anyone who has worked in the industry knows that it does not work and quality is the victim.  It’s a strategy mostly enforced by short term thinkers who need to hit short term KPI’s and who create a problem for the next person to fix.  It’s time for a paradigm shift in thinking how we can reduce cost and maintain quality and even improve it.  

Let’s look at this considering an analysis of 4 different models. 

We’ll assume that a company or business has decided it can achieve process improvement through systems integration, or they just need to reduce IT costs, and that includes the yearly integration bill.  It might seem odd to bundle these two opposing motivations into the same motivation for change – but in essence they are the same: Positive IT outcomes that help improve the business at a reasonable cost.

What options do these organizations have:

  • Enterprise Integration Software - Mature, fully featured established integration platforms which are the preferred option, however the higher license costs make these an expensive option
  • Opensource software - Whilst this option is appealing due to the lower license fee (opensource rarely means ‘free’), the business will most likely spend the majority of any license costs savings on building the appropriate framework and establishing a platform 
  • A Custom Solution - Many tier 2 or 3 organizations feel they can get away with developing a custom solution to suit their needs.  What often happens is the final solution is barely functional and lacks the inherent platform functionality often required to meet minimal requirements or regulatory requirements 
  • Managed Integration Delivery as a Service (MiDaaS) - The paradigm shift. A complete subscription based managed service.  This option gives you the full feature stack of the Enterprise Software at an affordable price, lower overheads and a quicker time to market.

Let’s take a look at where each of these options may work:

Enterprise

Traditional approach with large overheads, establishment costs, large license and support fees, and are generally tied to larger transformation projects.  This results in maintaining staff and capability over a longer period.

Opensource

The perception that opensource is freeware is a misconception.  These platforms do have a licensing component, and there is also the issue of resourcing with skilled people, and the software itself having the inherent frameworks of the Enterprise software.  This may result in cheaper licensing costs, however, it will most likely result in a more expensive development cost.  It also does not solve the issue of maintaining capability, staff and infrastructure overheads.

Custom Solutions

From the seeds of a custom solution, I give you technical debt and key resource reliability and constraint.  Custom solutions are good if you are tweaking your spreadsheet, or writing a small piece of code to make you irritating daily task easier to do, but in the realm of system integration, there is always a techie who thinks they can build their own integration platform. 

This is OK if you have 2 systems doing point to point and 1 or 2 integrations and you don’t want to expose those systems for consumption elsewhere.  All custom solutions very quickly outgrow their use as they soon discover that logging, message affinity, auditing etc., are pretty important things.  What seemed like a quick time to market at the time soon becomes a functionally limited highly customized piece of software that 1 person knows how to fix…

Managed Integration Delivery as a Service (MiDaaS)

  • Has the horsepower of the Enterprise software
  • Lower Total Cost of Ownership
  • Makes the organization technology agnostic
  • No technical debt will be carried by the business
  • Key resources/Capability maintenance/Staff overheads are no longer a problem
  • Subscription based pricing includes all infrastructure, design, build, test, maintenance, monitoring and alerting are all included
  • Reduces yearly cost of integration by a significant amount
  • Local account presence
  • Quality assured and consistency of service
  • Upgrades, maintenance, monitoring and alerting are all included 

Summary

In today’s world we are seeing a shift to the cloud and a form of managed services that see organizations infrastructure being managed by 3rd parties, but the actual work being done on the applications on that infrastructure is still managed in-house.  What I’m talking about is managing the complete Integration service from Design to BAU.  Sure all of the other approaches have their place for the moment because existing systems, teams, IT managers etc. are all in place and can’t see how to make the move to a fully managed service.  However, if we can make the move to the cloud, it shouldn’t take much to nudge us further along.

We are already seeing companies move to this model as they can see the immediate benefits and cost savings they can realize for their business.  This shift will continue at an increased pace once other companies see the benefits being realized by their competitors.

The paradigm shift is here.

New Call-to-action 

Topics: BPM/EA Technology, Intergration